April, 2010

...now browsing by month

 

Pretty Much

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Nothing to add here:

[President Obama] didn’t state the main qualification for any person who serves in government, the absence of which has lit a brushfire of discontent, fidelity to the Constitution.

He and his allies haven’t taken that first step to recovery — acknowledging their problem. It’s their utter disregard for the Constitution that is causing this big mess. The concept of a limited government, restrained in what it can and should do, is foreign to them, while for most Americans it’s in our DNA. This is what puts Obama at odds with so many Americans.

President Obama said his Supreme Court nominee will be someone who knows “that in a democracy, powerful interests must not be allowed to drown out the voices of ordinary citizens.”

Newsflash for the president! The most “powerful interest” in America today that is drowning out citizens’ voices is…. the government!

A Classic Reading Assignment For Tax Day

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

For weeks now, I have been thinking about writing a long treatise about income taxes and posting it on tax day, but then I realized that there is nothing I can write that would exceed what was writtenby Frank Chodrov in his book, The Income Tax: Root of All Evil. I happened across this book around 10 years ago and it was mind-blowing to me and, more than any other work, started me along the libertarian road that I walk today.

Chodrov’s “Argument” is reprinted below:

Tradition has a way of hanging on even after it is, for all practical purposes, dead. We in this country still use individualistic terms—as, for instance, the rights of man—when, as a matter of fact, we think and behave in the framework of collectivistic doctrine. We support and advocate such practices as farm-support prices, social security, government housing, socialized medicine, conscription, and all sorts of ideas that stem from the thesis that man has no rights except those given him by government.

Despite this growing tendency to look to political power as the source of material betterment and as the guide to our personal destinies, we still talk of limited government, states rights, checks and balances, and of the personal virtues of thrift, industry, and initiative. Thanks to our literature, the tradition hangs on even though it has lost force.
But there are many Americans to whom the new trend is distasteful, partly because they are traditionalists, partly because they find it personally unpleasant, partly because reason tells that it must lead to the complete subjugation of the individual, as in Nazi Germany or Communist Russia, and they don’t like the prospect. It is for these Americans that this book was written. For their opposition to the trend takes the shape of reform, while nothing will turn it but revo lution. And by “revolution” I mean the return to the people of that sovereignty which our tradition assumes them to have. I mean the return to them of the power which government confiscated by way of the Sixteenth Amendment.

When you examine any species of government intervention you find that it is made possible by revenues. A government is as strong as its income. Contrariwise, the independence of the people is in direct proportion to the amount of their wealth they can enjoy. We cannot restore traditional American freedom unless we limit the government’s power to tax. No tinkering with this, that, or the other law will stop the trend toward socialism. We must repeal the Sixteenth Amendment.
Washington, D.C.

F. C. February 1954

You can download and read the whole thing here.

Remember that this was written almost 50 years ago and then reflect on how much things have changed – and not for the better – since then.

Flying Unicorns and Clean Rainbow Technology!

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

Love it. But I still want my pony, dammit.

h/t The Corner